@Article{WangZAAACEG:2020:UpSeFo,
author = "Wang, Yunxia and Ziv, Guy and Adami, Marcos and Almeida,
Cl{\'a}udio Aparecido de and Antunes, Jo{\~a}o Francisco
Gon{\c{c}}alves and Coutinho, Alexandre Camargo and Esquerdo,
J{\'u}lio C{\'e}sar Dalla Mora and Gomes, Alessandra Rodrigues
and {Galbraith } and , David",
affiliation = "{University of Leeds} and {University of Leeds} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa
Agropecu{\'a}ria (EMBRAPA)} and {Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa
Agropecu{\'a}ria (EMBRAPA)} and {Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa
Agropecu{\'a}ria (EMBRAPA)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {University of Leeds}",
title = "Upturn in secondary forest clearing buffers primary forest loss in
the Brazilian Amazon",
journal = "Nature Sustainability",
year = "2020",
volume = "3",
number = "4",
pages = "290--295",
month = "Apr.",
abstract = "Brazil contains two-thirds of remaining Amazonian rainforests and
is responsible for the most Amazon forest loss. Primary forest
loss in the Brazilian Amazon has declined considerably since 2004
but secondary forest loss has never been quantified. We use a
recently developed high-resolution land use/land cover dataset to
track secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon over 14 yr,
providing the first estimates of secondary forest loss for the
region. We find that secondary forest loss increased by (187 +/-
48)% from 2008 to 2014. Moreover, the proportion of total forest
loss accounted for by secondary forests rose from (37 +/- 3)% in
2000 to (72 +/- 5)% in 2014. The recent acceleration in secondary
forests loss occurred across the entire region and was not driven
simply by increasing secondary forest area but probably a
conscious preferential shift towards clearance of a
little-protected forest ecosystem (secondary forests). Our results
suggest that secondary forests loss has eased deforestation
pressure on primary forests. However, this has been at the expense
of a lost carbon sequestration opportunity of 2.59-2.66 Pg C over
our study period. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon affects
both older (primary) and younger (secondary) forests. This study
finds that most forest loss over the period 2008-2014 was from
secondary forests and that the almost 190% rise in deforestation
buffered losses from primary forests.",
doi = "10.1038/s41893-019-0470-4",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0470-4",
issn = "2398-9629",
language = "en",
targetfile = "wang_upturn.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}